![]() |
|
Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - Printable Version +- LogicMachine Forum (https://forum.logicmachine.net) +-- Forum: LogicMachine eco-system (https://forum.logicmachine.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Scripting (https://forum.logicmachine.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 (/showthread.php?tid=437) |
Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - buuuudzik - 24.10.2016 Hello, I want prepare the integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 module. Normally it should work when I send the command via TCP. Code: host, port = '192.168.0.15', 7094
socket = require("socket")
client = socket.tcp()
client:settimeout(1)
client:connect(host, port)
cmd = string.char(0xFE,0xFE,0x7E,0xD8,0x60,0xFE,0x0D)
client:send(cmd)
result = client:receive()
log(result)Result is sometimes 'nill' and sometimes "Busy". I know that this should work because I've checked a communication with ETM-1 via some program which was prepared according with this documentation. According to the documentation to read armed partitions I must send: Code: cmd = string.char(0xFE,0xFE,0x09,0xD7,0xEB,0xFE,0x0D)Ethm-1 should answer with Code: 0xFE, 0xFE, 0x09, DATA1, DATA2, DATA3, DATA4, CRC_HIGH, CRC_LOW, 0xFE, 0x0Dbut the answer is 'nil' or 'Busy'(this command I can understand) RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - admin - 24.10.2016 Try increasing the timeout value, the device might need more than 1 second to produce a reply. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - buuuudzik - 24.10.2016 I've tried with timeout 3s and 5s and the situation is the same. I've also tried send example frame via Packet Sender and it works properly, ETHM-1 answered. So it looks like the command sent by LM is not properly. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - admin - 25.10.2016 Since you are calling receive() without any arguments it will try to receive all data before socket is closed which is probably not the behavior you want. Try specifying the number of bytes that the reply should contain and it should work. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - buuuudzik - 25.10.2016 (25.10.2016, 06:18)admin Wrote: Since you are calling receive() without any arguments it will try to receive all data before socket is closed which is probably not the behavior you want. Try specifying the number of bytes that the reply should contain and it should work. Good tip, because now I have response but this response is shorter than the query(look at the screenshot). I've tried also '*a' and '*l' arguments but they gave 'nill'. Response should have 15 bytes. Code: function str2hex(str)
raw_len = string.len(str)
i = 1
while i <= raw_len do
current_hexvalue = '0x' .. string.format("%02x", string.byte(str, i))
if value then
value = value .. ', ' .. current_hexvalue
else
value = current_hexvalue
end
i = i + 1
end
return value
end
socket = require('socket')
client=socket.tcp()
client:connect('192.168.2.9', 7094)
client:settimeout(1)
cmd = string.char(0xFE,0xFE,0x18,0xD7,0xFA,0xFE,0x0D)
log(cmd)
client:send( cmd )
result = client:receive(15)
result_str = lmcore.strtohex(result, true)
result_str1 = str2hex(result)
log(result, result_str, result_str1)And also unfortunately I've tried use lmcore.strtohex() but it gives me empty string. I've tried also the str2hex() from Erwin example but it gives me the same. I don't know also why the last 2 variables are not logged and there is no error describing this situation? I've checked another way and it works perfect Code: function str2hex(str)
raw_len = string.len(str)
i = 1
while i <= raw_len do
current_hexvalue = '0x' .. string.format("%02x", string.byte(str, i))
if value then
value = value .. ', ' .. current_hexvalue
else
value = current_hexvalue
end
i = i + 1
end
return value
end
socket = require('socket')
client=socket.tcp()
client:connect('192.168.2.9', 7094)
client:settimeout(1)
cmd = string.char(0xFE,0xFE,0x18,0xD7,0xFA,0xFE,0x0D)
log(cmd)
client:send( cmd )
result = client:receive(15)
result_str = lmcore.strtohex(result, true)
result_str1 = str2hex(result)
log(result)
log(result_str)
log(result_str1)I don't know why this works Code: log(result)
log(result_str)
log(result_str1)Code: log(result, result_str, result_str1)And maybe there is another way to receive some data because sometimes I will not know what is the data length? Maybe not in this script but in the future. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - admin - 25.10.2016 Correction: default receive pattern is '*l' - a single line, not the whole result. Receive() will return partial result as a third return value when an error occurs (that's why you are getting an empty string). So you can use '*a' pattern to receive everything until timeout occurs. This is not the most efficient way, but it will work ![]() Code: data, err, partial = client:receive('*a')
-- error
if not data then
data = partial
end
-- do something with data that's available
if data then
parsedata(data)
end
client:close()As for hex logging, new firmware will have loghex() function to make this easier. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - buuuudzik - 25.10.2016 'new' means 20160927?
RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - admin - 25.10.2016 The next release after that, 20160927 with KNX patch will be marked as stable. We will release a preview version sometime next month. Just got info from our partners that there's a Satel integration app in the works. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - buuuudzik - 25.10.2016 I have a script for a read the states of inputs. But I have a little problem in my resident script. I cannot use grp.write() or grp.update() because I have this error: Code: Line 0: attempt to call field 'rshift' (a nil value)I've tried send the same in the other script and there was ok. This is my script: Code: -- Integracja z systemem Satelem po TCP
cmd = string.char(0xFE,0xFE,0x00,0xD7,0xE2,0xFE,0x0D)
bytes = 23
-- function Satel(cmd, bytes)
function satel_send(cmd, bytes)
ethm_ip = '192.168.2.9'
port = 7094
socket = require('socket')
client=socket.tcp()
success, error = client:connect(ethm_ip, port)
if success == 1 and error == nil then
client:settimeout(0.3)
client:send(cmd)
data, error, partial = client:receive(bytes)
-- error
if not data then
data = partial
end
client:close()
end
return data
end
-- Funkcja odpowiedzialna za wyciągniecie poszczególnych bitów i wstawienie ich do tabeli
function convert(data)
local res, byte
res = {}
for i = 1, #data do
-- get single byte
byte = data:byte(i, i)
byte = string.char(byte)
bits = hex2bin(byte)
for b = 1, #bits do
-- get single bit
bit = bits:byte(b, b)
bit = string.char(bit)
if bit == '0' then
bin = false
elseif bit =='1' then
bin = true
end
-- add to result
res[i*4-(4-b)] = bin
end
end
return res
end
data = satel_send(cmd, bytes)
-- check if some data is available
if data then
data = lmcore.strtohex(data, true)
-- delete first 4 and last 8 chars
data = string.sub(data, 5, (string.len(data) -8))
inputs = convert(data)
else
log('Satel: zajęty')
end
-- update the inputs in the LM database
for i = 1, #inputs do
GA = '0/0/'.. tostring(91+i-1)
grp.update(GA , inputs[i])
endRE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - admin - 25.10.2016 You're overriding global "bit" which is used by other libraries in your convert function, add it to local declaration or rename this variable. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - PassivPluss - 26.10.2016 Interesting to connect to Satels First via ethm card and commands. I havet done this in my home with knx v1 interface from them. That works perfect inn case u need another solution
RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - buuuudzik - 26.10.2016 (26.10.2016, 20:40)PassivPluss Wrote: Interesting to connect to Satels First via ethm card and commands. I havet done this in my home with knx v1 interface from them. That works perfect inn case u need another solution I have a project with Integra 256plus so 64group addresses from KNX v1 or v2 is not enough. But I know some important tip from one Satel integrator that KNX module is much reliable than ethm when you have in your project communication via telephone link with monitoring station(when integra sends some data to the monitoring station all connections via ethm are terminated but KNX still works). So at this moment ethm is a full option(you can integrate whole installation without loosing any additional inputs/outputs) but you must have good script because sometimes ethm is "Busy!". KNX module v2 is reliable but you loose inputs/outputs, it has only 64 variables. RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - Dmitry - 13.10.2017 Satel APP for integration Satel Security System and KNX is avalable in store
RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - buuuudzik - 13.10.2017 Very nice app Is this app use the https? What is the price? Is this working with ETHM v1? Can you provide some manual?
RE: Integration with Satel alarm system via ETHM-1 - Dmitry - 16.10.2017 Manual is built in app. Application uses ETHM1 Plus module. |